First For Music News

NME News

Jared Leto responds to label lawsuit

And he says his band is not calling it quits

30 Seconds To Mars singer Jared Leto has responded on his band's website to a lawsuit brought against the group by Virgin/EMI to the tune of $30 million.

Opening with the news that his band have no intention of breaking up, Leto went on to describe the lawsuit as "ridiculously overblown" and says that the group are happily recording their new album in Los Angeles.

Of the lawsuit, Leto wrote: "As you may have heard we are being sued by our former record company for the ridiculously oversized, totally unrealistic and pretty silly (but slightly clever) sum of $30,000,000. Insane? Yeah, that's what we said too."

Leto says California law states an artist or act cannot be bound to a record label deal for more than seven years, and that 30 Seconds To Mars have been in theirs for nine years.

He added: "It is a law that protects people from lengthy, unfair, career-spanning contracts. This law also gave us the legal right to explore other possible opportunities."

The star then said it is because the band tried to extricate themselves from the contract that they are being sued.

He continued: "Yes, we have been sued by EMI. But NOT for failing to deliver music or for 'quitting'. We have been sued by the corporation quite simply because roughly 45 days ago we exercised our legal right to terminate our old, out of date contract, which, according to the law is null and void."

Leto then went on to talk about the fact that his band are still in debt to the label, after selling two million albums.

He said: "If you think the fact that we have sold in excess of two million records and have never been paid a penny is pretty unbelievable, well, so do we. And the fact that EMI informed us that not only aren't they going to pay us AT ALL but that we are still 1.4 million dollars in debt to them is even crazier. That the next record we make will be used to pay off that old supposed debt just makes you start wondering what is going on. Shouldn't a record company be able to turn a profit from selling that many records? Or, at the very least, break even? We think so."

--By our New York staff.
Find out more about NME.

Comments (4)

Add a comment

chequeredmaniac 

Aug 19, 2008

And the record companys wonder why people are pirating music. You buy the bands albums thinking you're contibuting to them but you're just funding faceless corporations, who you are "renting" the music from, as you can't do anything other than listen to it in headphones or by yourself because broadcasting it in the public domain is illegal, and so is making copies for personal use.

bangbangeche 

Aug 19, 2008

Surprise, surprise. Getting fucked over by a major record label!

CrashingBlimp 

Aug 19, 2008

Stick to acting. 30 seconds to mars are the most generically awful band out there besides nickelback.

crazyalien 

Oct 2, 2008

Seriously what the f**k is going on 30 seconds to mars don't deserve to have this law suit hanging over them it's a public outcry and I for one am totally outraged by this I hope Jared and the guys kick some serious a**!

Add your comment

 
 
Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday and Friday

  • Up-to-the-minute news stories
  • The best new music and free downloads
  • Video interviews, photo galleries, competitions and more
  • Album and track reviews for the week ahead
  • Essential gigs in your area