First For Music News

Graham Coxon responds to Damon Albarn's claim that 'Blur is over'

'It's very complicated,' guitarist admits

Graham Coxon has posted a lengthy update on his feelings about the possibility of a Blur reunion on the band's messageboard.

The guitarist was responding to recent comments made by Damon Albarn in an interview with Argentinean newspaper Clarin, where Albarn had said "Blur is over".

Coxon departed in 2002 and the remaining members went on to make 2003's 'Think Tank' album, their last release.

Writing under his username "tweedo" on the forum, Coxon appeared to have been taken by surprise by Albarn's statement.

"Damon didn't consult anybody else before he took it into his own hands to make this comment," he wrote. "Therefore I think it is nonsense. It isn't for him to decide."

A further post, written in a stream-of-consciousness style, went into more detail:

It read: "A good few years ago I said I couldn't ever see myself going back to Blur. People around me said with winks and nudges 'never say never, Gra' and I resented them saying it, but it was a difficult time and we were all hurt.

"I was one, they [Albarn, Alex James and Dave Rowntree] were three and I felt ganged up on a bit. I don't think they meant it to be that way. They were angry, I was angry.

"The anger was all centred around long, deep friendships that were tested and tested by business, mega-fatigue, too much time with each other, problems with the roles we played in the band, a lack of trust and communication.

"It's VERY complicated. I know it seems simple to solve all this...a phone call, an arrangement to meet up, a chat, hugs tears and a date pencilled in at the studio. I foolishly thought it could be that simple too, but I was wrong. Of course I was wrong and so was Alex.

"All four of us are kinda sick you must understand. We had around 12 years of really freakish behaviour, serious personal relationship problems, alcohol addictions and drug problems. You don't come through that without damage, without deep scars. It's the scars that have to be healed and they can't be unless we are willing to heal them ourselves.

"I feel I have done so much work on my own problems, stupidity, malfunctions, defects...as has Alex and Dave. I cant help thinking that Damon is still within a bit of a mad world that Blur were in in 1997 or 1998. Careering headlong into chaos, never resting, never pausing for thought. Because when you pause for thought the thoughts don't always like you. The thoughts tell you stuff you don't want to know or contemplate.

"I think Damon needs to rest and evaluate. I love Damon. I want him safe.

"The facts are like this really: there's no Blur at the moment. Damon probably ain't interested in a Blur that's not the full head count so I think it comes down to me trying again to contact him and talk to him. I tried before, as I said, and left messages.

"I want to do this anyway for the sake of all the years we were so close. But it takes guts. I psyched myself for days to call him last time and got the answering machine. It's a drag to get that after the psyching, the pondering over the mobile phone and the number and the pressing of the call button.

"I may have to psyche all over again. Be patient. No one knows the future, not even Damon."

Blur tickets:

Date / Time Artist Venue Town/City Buy
Nov 11, 2009 19:30 Blur Rncm (bruntwood Theatre) Manchester

Buy Blur tickets
from Seetickets


 

More News:

 

Comments (22)

Add a comment

noeling 

Sep 22, 2008

apparently blur is far from the top of damon's agenda, but i do think they will be back with one more 4-piece album before they call it a day, but the hiatus can be as long as that of the verve, kula shaker or portishead. if it is, we are actually half way through (Think Tank 2003) the waiting process.meanwhile, graham, how about one more solo albums? consider his last was 2 years ago which is long to his standard.honestly, i'd like to see damon bring his multi-talent back to blur who will continue to evolve from a musical standpoint

Harry90 

Sep 22, 2008

I feel sorry for these guys. they were rubbish then and if they came back theyd be rubbish now. They see Oasis about to begin a mega tour and album release, then all of a sudden Blur are 'coming back', who needs 'em. They are no different to any other of the hundreds and thousands of 'comeback' artists. real bands that mean things to people stay there always.

rubbersoul7 

Sep 23, 2008

Harry90, sorry to be the one to break it to you but Blur at their very worst were still far superior to Oasis. To call them 'rubbish' is laughable.

DJAlbertFreeman 

Sep 23, 2008

Wow, that's a really interesting, and open and honest message from Graham. Good on him for being so true to himself.

psj3809 

Sep 23, 2008

I've always been an Oasis fan but Blur have done a lot of great stuff. Parklife is a great album (The song Parklife is a dire novelty record though). I'll be glad if they did come back, did a lot of great stuff together.

Soundedd 

Sep 23, 2008

Harry90 - Spot on ;)

GreshamFlyer 

Sep 23, 2008

It'd be good to see this happen, simply because the whole Blur saga needs closure, for the fans and the band themselves. I doubt any of them would want Think Tank as their epitaph. One last wonderful album, a few monumental shows, the end. If The Verve an do it (and they've a far more fractious relationship), so can Blur.It is going to happen, I'm sure (don't forget that it nearly did back in 2005 - I had tickets for their cancelled gig). It'll just take a couple more years.

deibid 

Sep 23, 2008

i completely disagree with Harry90's comments, how can you call one of britain's most successful & influential bands rubbish? maybe you don't like em, but that doesn't mean they're rubbish. blur are not all of a sudden "coming back". where does it say that? what's oasis got to do with anything? tweedo was very kindly giving an insight of a situation to a close community who regard blur as their favourite band.it would be a shame if blur don't record as a 4 peice again cos what they have together is very special, but healing old wounds mending friendships is the most important thing. blur will alway mean a LOT to may, many people.

ed2005 

Sep 23, 2008

Harry90 - 'real bands that mean things to people stay there always.' I beg to differ. Joy Division ended after the singer's suicide 28 years ago and still mean a heluva lot to many. As for comparing oasis and blur, it's no longer 1995. Get over it. Blur never retrod old ground, Oasis have been trading old ground for over a decade.

03short1 

Sep 23, 2008

woah m8 i think youre reading too much into this theyre not "coming back" graham was just responding to the fact that Damon Albarn was making the final choice about a band that they were all part of. And who says they were rubbish or that they don't matter to people they were one of the defining bands of the 90s and they still get a lot of play now. Blur are the britpop band for the people who are bored of the mindless straight up pop songs that make up of most of oasis's music

JoeBananas 

Sep 23, 2008

Harry90 - I've read some crap in my time, but that is up there with the best of it. 'Real bands that mean things to people stay there always', I'm almost wetting myself laughing at that. An Oasis fan trying to philosophise is comedy at it's best. So do you believe the five sold out My Bloody Valentine gigs at the Roundhouse were performed by a 'comeback band' that aren't real? That meant nothing to the thousands of people that attended? Gimme a break...

mozafan 

Sep 23, 2008

they'll never be as good as oasis

milesihamer 

Sep 23, 2008

Blur vs Oasis? What is this, 1995? Hmm, let me wade in then. Oasis = turgid, recycled hoary cliched pastiche. Music for people who don't really like music. Blur = Bowie-style reinvention, multi-layered pop genius (with sporadic moments of woeful inadequacy admittedly).

kufirst 

Sep 23, 2008

oasis and blur are two completely different bands. i like both of them a lot, but tend to enjoy blur a bit more because they really have a sort of artistry to their music more so than oasis does. well, if there is one member that has a final say about the status of blur, it's certainly albarn, there's obviously no blur without him. it's thoroughly difficult to understand what damon wants and i think that's the way he likes it. good luck to them if they try to make things work.

mmirko 

Sep 23, 2008

I agree with milesihamer. I hope Blur comeback soon... They are one of the best bands in the last decade... I'm a big fan of Oasis but Blur is better.. no doubt about that pals... Dig out your souls is a very dissapointed record... Three years waiting for that record?? what a shame!Chiiersss!

Benlaimwolf 

Sep 23, 2008

2009 Glasto Headliners - Watch this space

stockholmmonster 

Sep 23, 2008

money is an exceptional lubricant.....i am sure they will be guided by its power.

Soundedd 

Sep 23, 2008

If you think Blur are better than Oasis....you havn't got a pot to piss in. Fucking awful band, maybe not quite as bad as The Verve but there was only one band in the 1990's, god i love Oasis.

WolfAmoungWolves 

Sep 23, 2008

So real bands stay there always do they Harry90? The fact that there's only 2 original members of Oasis left in the band, proves what a load of cack you're talking. The only half decent album Oasis have ever made was the first one anyway.At least Blur realise that unless they're all back together, then things won't work, although it makes me extremely sad to think they might never record together again. And comparing Gra's words here to the endless rubbish from Noel G's blogs you've been publishing, only really demonstrates how much more of an intelligent and interesting band Blur are, and always were, than Oasis.

possitive mental attitude 

Sep 26, 2008

soundedd... you idiot your a disgrace to all oasis fans..giving it that Blur maybe better than the Verve....f**kin hell listen to yourself... Just leave damon alone to make more shit music with his little cartoon friends.. does graham coxon and the other cheese making dude really need him... they really are just a bunch of cockney cheeky chappies

Harry90 

Sep 29, 2008

Oasis rule and always will, you Blur fans have been hiding away in your bedrooms tightly gripping their albums since they split and you still think they are gonna come back and save you from Oasis' domination...grow up. ed2005, i agree with you about Joy Division but they had a pretty valid reason for not continuing but instead cameback as new order. what i meant by staying there always was the songs 'live forever' obviously bands have to call it a day but theres a reason bands like The Beatles, Oasis, Rolling Stones etc. are more popular than others. Oasis songs are played all oer the place, when was the last time you heard Blur anywhere other than their cds.

lushgirl 

Dec 10, 2008

harry90,now you can see that you are totally wrong.damon and blur don't need to use this way to gain publicity,they don't like oasis,which need to use disgusting news to help people to remember them.

Add your comment

Blur

Blur

Listen to full tracks now. Users outside the UK can hear 30-second clips of each song.

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox: