Judge upholds driving charges against Britney Spears
Britney Spears...
He disagrees that she was targeted for being a celebrity
A Los Angeles judge has refused to drop charges against Britney Spears of driving without a valid licence.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James A. Steele upheld the charges at a hearing on Tuesday (September 2) in which her attorney argued that prosecutors were targeting the pop star because she is a celebrity.
Steele disagreed, saying she was correctly charged because she'd been driving without a valid California licence after being a resident of the state for 17 months. California law requires application for a state licence within 10 days of becoming a resident.
The charges stem from an incident in 2007 in which Spears hit a parked car and left without notifying the owner. She was originally cited for hit-and-run and driving without a license, but the hit-and-run charges were dropped.
The judge's latest ruling means the pop star will likely go to trial in October, reports the Associated Press.
--By our Los Angeles staff.
Find out more about NME.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James A. Steele upheld the charges at a hearing on Tuesday (September 2) in which her attorney argued that prosecutors were targeting the pop star because she is a celebrity.
Steele disagreed, saying she was correctly charged because she'd been driving without a valid California licence after being a resident of the state for 17 months. California law requires application for a state licence within 10 days of becoming a resident.
The charges stem from an incident in 2007 in which Spears hit a parked car and left without notifying the owner. She was originally cited for hit-and-run and driving without a license, but the hit-and-run charges were dropped.
The judge's latest ruling means the pop star will likely go to trial in October, reports the Associated Press.
--By our Los Angeles staff.
Find out more about NME.






Add your comment
Please sign in to add your comments or register to have your say.