First For Music News

NME Festival Guide
2009

Glastonbury's Michael Eavis considering festival flag ban

Boss may follow example of Reading And Leeds Festivals

Glastonbury festival chief Michael Eavis is considering banning flags from the Somerset site following the announcement that they will be banned from the Reading And Leeds Festivals this year.

Melvin Benn, head of Festival Republic, which runs the Reading And Leeds Festivals and also helps to organise Glastonbury, told BBC News that he had had discussions about a possible ban on Worthy Farm with site owner Eavis.

Speaking about this year's Glastonbury event, which was headlined by Blur, Bruce Springsteen and Neil Young in June, he said: "You couldn't see the acts. The flags were everywhere. There have always been flags, but not to the level that there has been. And the flags have become very long and tall."

Festival-goers have been divided on the matter. Sarah Jelly from Nottingham told NME.COM: "Flags are a big part of UK festivals, just like the mud at Glastonbury." Ashley Wilkinson from Reading, however, said, "I cannot stand flags at festivals. There's nothing worse than getting a great position then fools in front of you arrive with a huge flag."

For more on the flags at festivals debate see the new issue of NME, out tomorrow (August 26).

Do you think flags should be banned at festivals? Sign into MyNME and post your thoughts in the comment box below.


Glastonbury tickets:

More Glastonbury tickets

 

More News

 

Comments (5)

Add a comment

mart_cfc 

Aug 25, 2009

Fuck off Festival Republic. Flags only trouble TV broadcasts. Not once did a flag obstruct my view at glastonbury this year. If you want a perfectly shot, atmosphere lacking set, get the band in the studio. If you want to broadcast from festivals, allow the atmosphere and whatever goes with it, be part of it. Maybe he should worry more about piss throwers at the scum weekender fest, than a few flags disrupting the view from the sofa.

Zevon 

Aug 25, 2009

I was in the pit for Springsteen and near for Neil Young. Up front, the flags aren't problem. A bit further back you can only see the poles. But watching Blur from some distance back, you had to rely on video screens. US friends watching the TV coverage were astonished by how obscured by flags Bruce was. So, yeah, maybe the flags have to go, but they do add something to the atmosphere....

kiers83 

Aug 26, 2009

Flags are gay, end of. Why do you want to wave a big flag while watching an act?I'll tell you why, its so you can tell your mum to look our for you on the tele. They dont add to the atmosphere, they just get in the way.Mart_cfc, its not just those on the sofa that cant see, its those who want to chill at the back and stay away from the sweaty teens at the front who cant see either.

kingofthemooners 

Aug 26, 2009

damn right. they ruin things! i dont understand why people go to the effort of lugging round a massive flagpole anyway, what do they even get out of it? most the time the flags are of no significance either, it just blocks the view for thousands of others.

Poirot1 

Aug 26, 2009

I’m not a fan of the flag and can’t agree with Mart’s comment that they are ‘atmospheric’. If you think that is atmospheric then you’re missing the many other great things Glastonbury has to offer.Sure, they are a ‘big part of festivals’ as one festival goer says but only for the saddos who choose to bring them. Anyone who chooses to prop a massive pole up for hours on end has to be sad to think it’s worth enduring – especially the owner of “I heart sausage”. (Very ‘atmospheric’ that one!).We go to Glastonbury to be entertained, so perhaps the Eavis’s should make flag wielders earn their right to wave their message. Run a competition and choose the most 10 most creative flags which will be the only ones allowed in the arena. Let’s see how “I heart sausage” fares then…

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox:

Glastonbury CDs