First For Music News

Manic Street Preachers in row with supermarkets over new album

Major chains won't display 'Journal For Plague Lovers' cover

Manic Street Preachers have courted controversy once again, with supermarkets refusing to display their new album cover.

'Journal For Plague Lovers' is set for release on Monday (May 18), but major supermarket chains will only stock it in a blank slipcase because they fear that the cover image (pictured) will offend.

Some observers reckon that the painting by British artist Jenny Saville depicts a child with a bloodied face, a claim which frontman James Dean Bradfield said was "totally bizarre".

He told BBC 6 Music: "We just thought it was a beautiful painting. We were all in total agreement.

"If you're familiar with her work, there's a lot of ochres and browns, and reds and browns and perhaps people are looking for us to be more provocative than we are being. We just saw a much more modern version of Lucian Freud-esque brushstrokes. That's all we saw."

Four of the main supermarket chains - Sainsbury's, Tesco, Asda and Morrisons - will only stock the album with the blank sleeve cover.

Sainsbury's music buyer Nicola Williamson said: "We felt that some customers might consider this particular album cover to be inappropriate if it were prominently displayed on the shelf. As such, the album will be sold in a sleeve provided by the publisher."

But Bradfield was not convinced by the argument. "You can have lovely shiny buttocks and guns everywhere in the supermarket on covers of magazines and CDs," he said, "but you show a piece of art and people just freak out."

'Journal For Plague Lovers' features lyrics left behind by guitarist Richey Edwards, who went missing in 1995. The band analyse the words and remember Edwards in this week's issue of NME, out now.

Feature - the wisdom of Manic Street Preachers, 1991-2009.

Blog - read the full, unedited transcript of our epic Manic Street Preachers interview.

 

More News:

 

Comments (24)

Add a comment

slashdotdashdot 

May 15, 2009

Simple solution: don't allow supermarkets to stock it. Get people back into record shops!

shityourlegoff 

May 15, 2009

What convenient free publicity this is for them. Cocks.

stephen4foos 

May 15, 2009

not that i think it's offensive..but it does look like the child got whacked a bit

chrispaz 

May 15, 2009

Yeah, what a cleverly orchestrated scheme that is. shityourlegoff, you've got no idea.

abbymc 

May 15, 2009

It's not "a child with a bloodied face" though. Jenny Saville (the artist) herself says it's a girl with a birthmark. So are people with birthmarks aren't welcome in supermarkets in case they offend the other sensitive souls that shop there? Maybe they should put a bag over their heads or something, just in case.

futha 

May 15, 2009

shityourlegoff - Its just an album cover, its not exactly overly provocative either. Its not them thats created controversy.

melophobe 

May 15, 2009

i HATE this band with all my heart and soul, but this is a truely beautiful image, and the little welsh fella is absolutely right in his comments... i've worked for tesco for 7 years and right now on their cd shelves are naked women, guns, an eminems face made up of drugs. BULLSHIT

fiery55 

May 15, 2009

I agree with Slashdot...; if I was in a band I wouldn't want my album to be stocked in supermarkets amongst '2-for-1' curries and the like anyway. Also, Shityourlegoff, do you actually know anything about this band or, for that matter, any other band on this site?

MahadyTheLips 

May 15, 2009

surprise surprise.it looks too offensive. they must be loving this. you're controversial ur cool in the rock world i suppose. but honestly i hate the idea of censorship in general. its just boing

Ghvinianidzigol 

May 15, 2009

As laughable as this is, it does show that the cover is a great piece of art. If a painting - a painting! we're living in the 21st century and are used to advanced 3D headblasts, but here's plain old oil on canvas - can evoke these sort of reactions then the painter really is onto something. I did think the picture was by Lucien Freud, though.

TheHopper 

May 15, 2009

they'll soon enough be covered in dust

ed2005 

May 15, 2009

Don't find the album cover offensive, but I really have to agree with fiery55 and slashdotdashdot: support local record shops, not the bloody supermarkets.

Spaceboyzero 

May 15, 2009

The hypocrisy of it all really is amazing, violent video games, porn magazines and slasher movie DVD'S are gladly stocked on supermarket shelves while a piece of art with no obvious intention to offend is deemed too explicit. Let the consumer buy as much cheap alcohol as they can just dont offend them with a painting.

err...no 

May 15, 2009

I thought it was a picture of a child with a birthmark. perhaps people should take more notice and not just jump to conclusions. It is art.

ognum1971 

May 15, 2009

hmm how hilarious,our local supermarkets taking the mantel of the new thought police -next there will be cameras hidden deep in the fruit and veg section judging our very souls!!!!arrrrgghhh -bejesus- it really does show us the hypocrisy of modern consumerism-some kid shot dead in salford a couple of days ago,and you morrisons asda and tesco s selling what can ultimately be described as the ultimate muscle mary that is 50 pence, er ,cent-the purveyor of all that is shit hop,showing his tits off menacingly near the basked beans isle -fuk me how bizzare

ognum1971 

May 15, 2009

hmm how hilarious,our local supermarkets taking the mantel of the new thought police -next there will be cameras hidden deep in the fruit and veg section judging our very souls!!!!arrrrgghhh -bejesus- it really does show us the hypocrisy of modern consumerism-some kid shot dead in salford a couple of days ago,and you morrisons asda and tesco s selling what can ultimately be described as the ultimate muscle mary that is 50 pence, er ,cent-the ultimate purveyor of all that is shit hop,showing his tits off menacingly near the basked beans isle -fuk me how bizzare

charlieangel 

May 15, 2009

Yet another case of preemptive censorship. Whatever the band, whatever the cover, this is sickening. THIS is the real plague of today. If you tolerate this, etc. etc.

dcmarshall 

May 17, 2009

I just find the behaviour of the supermarkets utterly disgusting. The artist Jenny Saville has said it is a painting of a child with a birthmark. My daughter has a very similar birthmark and I am wondering whether I have to put a 'plain slipcover' over her head when I next do a supermarket shop. This only goes to further discrimination on the grounds of appearance in this country. Unbelieveable

Willy Plonka 

May 17, 2009

You can go into my local Sainsbury and get Dildo gel and fucking Anal Sex Cream, but you cant display a fucking record sleeve. I actually thought the kid had the Plague round his mouth, not been battered.......the whole worlds gone mad............

adolfhardoff 

May 17, 2009

It's pretty hard to discribe this without involving the word pathetic... Some people are so damn naive!"We Live It Up In Hell"... We Destroy Sainsbury's, Tesco, Asda and Morrisons

Early Discloser 

May 17, 2009

How do people with such an inadequate grasp of the English language come to be writing your articles? To 'court' controvery means to actively seek it. Regardless of whether or not the band have done so in this case (which looks unlikely) the text assumes a neutral viewpoint, with no suggestion of any 'courting' having gone on, outside the initial, poor phraseology.

shityourlegoff 

May 17, 2009

Manic Street Sweepers are a bunch of tedious slum landlords whose shouty teenage drivel music is well past its sell by date. hence this obvious PR stunt with the shit artwork.

The Gutless Wonder 

May 17, 2009

Jenny Saville's artwork is beautiful and it is disgusting that it is being censored. Also, 'teenage drivel music'? What planet are you on mate? Britains best band.

shameless 90s throwback 

May 19, 2009

NOWHERE NEAR as offensive as "101 Housework Songs - the perfect gift for Mother's Day"

Add your comment

Listen to full tracks now. Users outside the UK can hear 30-second clips of each song.

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox: