First For Music News

UK government to extend copyright law?

Beatles and The Who stand to lose royalties if the law isn't amended

British Culture Minister Andy Burnham has said that the government is preparing to extend the copyright law for performers to 70 years.

At present, performers currently lose copyright after 50 years.

Speaking to the UK Music Creators' Conference in London, Burnham said: "It's only right that someone who created or contributed to something of real value gets to benefit for the full course of their life."

The current law has been opposed by the likes of Paul McCartney, The Who's Roger Daltrey and Cliff Richard, who say it should be brought in line with American laws, which last 95 years.

Burnham added that the law should be changed for moral reasons, reports BBC News.

"There is a moral case for performers benefiting from their work throughout their entire lifetime," he said. "We must ensure that any extension delivers maximum benefit to performers and musicians. That's the test of any model as we go forward."

If the UK law remains, royalties from Cliff Richard's earliest songs, such as his 1958 hit 'Move It', will expire on January 1.

The Beatles' back catalogue copyright is set to start expiring in 2013.
 

More News:

 

Comments (5)

Add a comment

Number Johnny Five 

Dec 12, 2008

Oh no! If the Beatles and The Who start losing royalties who's gonna pay for the sheep/trout?

NicholaCarr 

Dec 12, 2008

Well let's face it they don't need the money do they, but who would get the money if they didn't? or will people just be able to use the songs for free? how does this work?

ape_dosmil 

Dec 13, 2008

NicholaCarr: It means the recordings go out of copyright, they go into the public domain and they become free to the public. The recordings become completely legal to download, share and copy. I don't think many people realise it but alot of Elvis Presley etc. early recordings are out of copyright in this country. Meaning you can bit-torrent/limewire them to your hearts content completely legally.

Ickle Nicci 

Dec 13, 2008

It will mean that their songs are free to use to anyone, in youtube videos, as samples etc. It will also mean that the market is flooded with 'Best Of' compilations, as anyone could make them and keep all the royalties except for songwriting. And don't we just need another Beatles best of?

TheKLF99 

Dec 21, 2008

Isn't Paul McCartney contradicting himself here, one minute he's claiming to not be bothered if people download his music for free, and now he's saying he wants the copyright law extending. One solution is to make the copyright law extend throughout the life of the person.

Add your comment

The Beatles                                                                             Pic: PA Photos

The Beatles...

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox: