File-sharing only makes big acts bigger, study shows
Piracy doesn't seem to give new bands exposure, it is claimed
The era of file-sharing has not increased the exposure of new artists, according to a new study.
According to a study commissioned by royalties body PRS, the most-pirated tracks on the internet tend to be those already at the top of the charts. The organisation claims that this trend only serves to make popular stars even more popular, reports BBC News
The news seemingly strikes a blow to those who believed that file-sharing would democratise music and find a bigger audience for emerging new artists.
Study authors Will Page of PRS and Eric Garland of media tracking firm Big Champagne looked at patterns to find out of the so-called 'Long Tail' theory held water.
As they described it, 'Long Tail' claims that "if you offer people more choice, and help them make that choice, they will take that choice."
But their results found this not to be the case. They wrote: "Much of the volume (sales or swaps) is concentrated amongst a small proportion of available tracks."
They believe this has happened because the internet actually offers too much choice, and concluded: "After taking into account some geographic differences, the top of the many music charts, from licensed and unlicensed venues, are markedly similar."
According to a study commissioned by royalties body PRS, the most-pirated tracks on the internet tend to be those already at the top of the charts. The organisation claims that this trend only serves to make popular stars even more popular, reports BBC News
The news seemingly strikes a blow to those who believed that file-sharing would democratise music and find a bigger audience for emerging new artists.
Study authors Will Page of PRS and Eric Garland of media tracking firm Big Champagne looked at patterns to find out of the so-called 'Long Tail' theory held water.
As they described it, 'Long Tail' claims that "if you offer people more choice, and help them make that choice, they will take that choice."
But their results found this not to be the case. They wrote: "Much of the volume (sales or swaps) is concentrated amongst a small proportion of available tracks."
They believe this has happened because the internet actually offers too much choice, and concluded: "After taking into account some geographic differences, the top of the many music charts, from licensed and unlicensed venues, are markedly similar."
More News:










Comments (13)
Add a comment
ebony-i
May 15, 2009
shityourlegoff
May 15, 2009
Jerd42mod
May 16, 2009
ed2005
May 16, 2009
scottmmmm
May 16, 2009
djaniquinn
May 17, 2009
djaniquinn
May 17, 2009
HellBez
May 17, 2009
djaniquinn
May 17, 2009
ed2005
May 17, 2009
jorges
May 17, 2009
chrispaz
May 18, 2009
ed2005
May 18, 2009
Add your comment
Please sign in to add your comments or register to have your say.