NME Reviews

The Kooks

Konk

There’s this great game we play sometimes down the pub on a Thursday, after we’ve dotted the i’s on the Tracks page and legalled Peter Robinson Vs for another week. It’s called Who’s In Your Triptych Of Evil? and basically involves each of us putting arguing which band has committed the most heinous crimes against indie. By which we mean who, under an ever-thinning punk-rock guise of skinny jeans and stupid hair, has made the most cynical play for mainstream adulation with another bunch of brainless MOR guitar pap this week? Needless to say, Razorlight, The Fratellis and The Pigeon Detectives are often held up as prime examples. One band, however, for whom debate on the subject regularly rages well into the night are The Kooks. Agreed, on paper they seem like the obvious candidate to take pole position on that triangle of doom – what with the Brit school ‘star-academy’ background, the factory line procession of members, the perfectly tousled ‘just slept in a gutter with some groupies’ locks… But, well, you just try not humming along to ‘Naïve’ after a few vodka and limes.

That Lily Allen and former Sugababe sourpuss Mutya Buena, two of Britain’s most creative female solo pop acts, chose to cover it is credit to its classic status. As, presumably, are the 1.5million album sales to people able to look past The Kooks’ ‘unauthentic’ exterior and endless schmindie derision to embrace debut ‘Inside In/Inside Out’. And, while no-one back in NME’s local ever gets so pissed as to argue there’s much art to Luke Pritchard’s tunes, we’ll rarely make it to last orders without begrudgingly admitting his master craftsmanship. Why are we telling you all this? So you realise that we’re as disappointed with the mark at the end of this review as we expect the band will be when they see it.

The first thing that strikes you about ‘Konk’ is that it certainly isn’t the “more aggressive” follow-up Luke Pritchard promised in interviews earlier this year. What it – perhaps inevitably – is, though, is an attempt to take ‘Inside In/Inside Out’’s success to the next, Razorlight-sized level. Unfortunately, it fails at that too. Following the departure of bassist Max Rafferty in January – shortly after sessions for the album had been completed – ‘Konk’ is the sound of a band in disarray, unsuccessfully attempting to hold things together. Not that you’d necessarily know from album opener ‘See The Sun’: unlike the rest of ‘Konk’ it fizzes with the carefree abandon, the lovestruck emotion, the giddy melodies and rousing lyrics of their previous high points.

But that’s where the fun stops. In fact, it’s fair to say that ‘Konk’ is home to a litany of duff tracks. For starters, ‘Mr Maker’ is brainless Britpop-by-numbers. “Mr Maker he’s got it made/A beautiful wife and a baby on the way” sings the increasingly jaded-sounding Pritchard, showcasing jarringly formulaic lyrics over a jarringly formulaic tune. The Kooks’ melodic simplicity has worked in the past (see previous single ‘Ooh La’ for evidence) but when it’s so straightforward it sounds like the theme tune to a toddlers TV programme you know a wrong turn’s been taken. This new-found lyrical weakness is also painfully evident on ‘One Last Time’, on which they resort to spelling out the alphabet for lack of anything else to sing about. Even more grating than the lyrics, though, is the slurred voice in which Pritchard delivers them. Presumably it’s a ploy to sound half-cut and, ergo, more like a proper rock band. But over production this glossy and expensive it’s not fooling anyone.

Then there’s ‘Sway’, hyped as one of the album’s big tracks, but in reality merely a mess of cod emotion and tired bombast. There’s nothing wrong with an epic rock ballad per se, but ‘Sway’ just doesn’t quite have the reach needed to tug on the heart strings. Emotion works best for The Kooks when they strip things down rather than build them up. Their debut’s acoustic opener ‘Seaside’ was one of the album’s most touching moments because it was a minimalist affair, constructed from Pritchard’s whispered voice and a plaintively plucked guitar alone.

It’s a trick they only seem to remember by ‘Konk’’s final track, ‘Tick Of Time’ – a luxuriant acoustic number smothered in harmonies and with a hazy late-night jam feel, which has more feeling in a few simple strums of guitar than in the rest of the album combined. The questions remain: why are these genuinely affecting moments are so few and far between? Why have this bunch of consummate professionals been so strongly hit by second album syndrome? Perhaps those 1.5million album sales
went to their head after all. It’s certainly affected their judgement. Pritchard previously claimed they had over 80 songs written for the new album. Eighty songs? And they chose these?

What’s clear is that they’ve lost the songwriterly knack they originally wielded with abandon and replaced it with clichés and a foggy palimpsest of what they once had. We recommend they search high and low for that spark of brightness in time for album three.

Leonie Cooper

5 out of 10

Comments (64)

Add a comment

jackielake 

Apr 12, 2008

this album shall be career suicide

skybluepancho 

Apr 12, 2008

''Why are we telling you all this? So you realise that we’re as disappointed with the mark at the end of this review as we expect the band will be when they see it.''rubbish, that's just a cover up. you think people will be happy with this review and understand why you gave this album 5/10, cos you said you were dissapointed.haha. i've heard this album (well konk, not rak), yes maybe it's not as good as 'inside in/inside out' but it's still a quality album with more than a few decent tunes. better than 7/10 mariah carey i think.what's going on nme, your reviews are down. i guess you've gotta keep the popworld happy.i can't wait for the review of the last shadow puppets album, their song's brilliant and i've no doubt the album will be the same. but you'll give it 8 or 9, just to please mr alex turner.not much to do with the music anymore. 8/10 for estelle, 7/10 for mariah carey. huh?. why? who reviewed them, your ten year old little sister.can we see a review of high school musical's album's in here next week.

Ziggychaz 

Apr 12, 2008

That pub game is pure indie snobbery and this review is a little unjust.

newyork92 

Apr 13, 2008

Wow NME you really are such snobs...personally I can't wait to get this album, it doesn't sound really like they've changed their sound much, true, but that's worked really well for them and just because this album isn't going to be that different doesn't mean it's necessarily bad.

dr_ross 

Apr 13, 2008

spot on, terrible band, terrible album. and your pub game is class, with the same names popping up as i would choose. don't forget the view!

mightyboosh144 

Apr 13, 2008

This review is so "Chinese".

mightyboosh144 

Apr 13, 2008

Looks like The Kook's cooked up some good music, don't care what ENEMY has to say! This is worse than Nazi Germany!

Bilargie 

Apr 13, 2008

sky blue totally powned NME.but Kooks are crap and so is NME.Never bought a copy of their magazine since they but the Artic Monkeys above the Beatles. NME = Little indie fart

mrbuff 

Apr 13, 2008

I agree that this album is no way near as good as the first, and I hated the first single. However, I disagree agree with you Leonie, I think that Sway is an amazing song- thank god for single tracks on iTunes

leewilson2607 

Apr 13, 2008

What a shambolic article. The kooks are not a band in dissaray, far from infact. Selling out huge venues within the 1st 20 minutes of the tickets actually going on sale. They have proved critics already with the release of their 1st single off of konk, reaching number 3 in the uk charts. Having also watched 'NME loves The Kooks' on NME tv, it may appear that 'leonie cooper's' more significant colleagues will question the validity of this article. Yeah thats right, NME loves The Kooks!

unclechopchop 

Apr 14, 2008

I took the time and hassle to register for mynme because i was so disgusted by the article in question. Were you listening to the right album? I truly believe that your editor should proof read your articles before letting your indie pretentious attitude be read by a music loving nation. long gone are the days where i regarded nme as a valid opinion. you should seriously reconsider publishing such utter ball-hang on your website.

bsellars 

Apr 14, 2008

From NME's reviews on the Raconteurs, the Kooks and Black Rebel's new albums, I think NME may need to get someone who knows music a little bit better. The shit that is premoted by the magazine is quite sicking.

jordnz 

Apr 14, 2008

The most bullshit review i've seen on NME ever. If anyone should quit they're job it the author. Konk is not as good as inside in/inside out but its not shocking. You didn't even talk about half the songs. The lyrics are fine and see the sun is a brilliant song. Tick of time is a pure sign of the incredible talent that the kooks have and i think this author needs to get off her high horse and realize that the kooks are much more talented than bands such as the arctic monkeys. Don't get me wrong i like they're the most over-rated band of the century.

Binamoong 

Apr 14, 2008

Spot on NME. This Album is a huge dissapointment.

steelneil 

Apr 14, 2008

Razorlight, the Fratellis and the Pigeon Detectives you say? So how come NME gave 8/10, 8/10 and 7/10 to those band's last albums? Are they not cool anymore? Have some integrity NME, have you heard of consistency at all???

Soundedd 

Apr 14, 2008

jordnz, what an idiot you really are, Arctic Monkeys are unbelievably talented, why use this album review to have a dig at them, pathetic. Arctics are a far better band that the Kooks, but despite that this is a great album. Class single in "Always Where I Need To Be" and tracks such as "See The Sun", "Mr Maker" and "Sway" are pure class, NME need to get of the Kooks back, there not one of the front running Indie bands but they produce catchy tunes, and thats all that matters, how NME can give this 5 and drizzle like Gnarls Barklay & Estelle higher is a joke.

wastedlittledj92 

Apr 14, 2008

quality review

Hannah_Smith_ 

Apr 14, 2008

1st off - Sounded, The Kooks, remarkably, are one of the front running indie bands around at the momeny. They rode the rise of inde wave and made it huge with one album which is pretty impressive. And listen to you, hating Gnarls Barkley and Estelle just because it isn't indie, they are original and actually awesome so :PHow ironic to hear the NME diss bands that they spend half their time ranting how amazing they are. Ridiculous, as usual NME is more concerned about being cool (which it isn't) that what might just be good.Id be more bothered, but the Kooks suck so I like the review

mark has stripey socks 

Apr 14, 2008

having just listened to the album on napster, i'm sad to say this review is spot on :(

Soundedd 

Apr 15, 2008

It's irrelevant what genre Gnarls and Estelle are, The fact is there both shite, I mean remember Crazy, one of the worst musical moments of all time, every chav in the land bought it. You make it sound Hannah as if I only like Indie which is total bollucks, I like many many artists who are as far away from Indie as it gets. The Kooks are a quality band, but there not as good as some for me.

rick 13 

Apr 15, 2008

dont like the kooks, his voice does my head in the little fake scouser!!!

AdamShanklyUK 

Apr 15, 2008

You should have lowered the review to 4/10 simply for Luke Pritchard's terrible teeth... the minger.Anyhoo, anyone who's wasting their life defending this album is doing so in vain.For it will be relegated to the bargain bins before the next full moon and rightly regarded, along with most of today's music, as disposable garbage fit for music's expanding landfill whether you like it or not.

Valvetronix 

Apr 15, 2008

They gave them a shit review because you either like the kooks or the monkeys, and it seems that NME and everyone else have their cocks up the arctic monkeys. This alblum is class, par with inside in inside out.

jof hill 

Apr 15, 2008

I read the review last week and so stuck the album on with some trepidation; being a massive fan of the last album. It's cracking. I have to agree with some other readers here that the NME reivew is no longer a yardstick by which to measure records. It's down to personal taste at the end of the day. But if you liked Inside in/ Inside out, then you're going to love this

josh-mason 

Apr 15, 2008

i think its one of those albums that you need to sit down in the sun and have a good listen to. every good band has a dodgy second album. Listen to tick of time and then tell me that its crap.

vonman 

Apr 15, 2008

There aren't as many potential hit singles on the new album, there were about 8 or so on the first. It's worth a 7/10, they do the pop/rock thing quite well. It's better than Razorlight's second album effort anyway.

adno11 

Apr 15, 2008

It's a good album, don't really know whats going on with NME anymore it seems they have strayed form decent music and rate the sh1t pop thats out there. Your reviews seem blinkered and you talk so much rubbish before you even get the the point you make, yeah everyone's entitled to an opinion but come on, get a grip. NME have lost so mush respect in the recent years due to there reviews, open your minds!

lmb92 

Apr 16, 2008

anyone who defends the kooks hasnt got a good music sense so noone will listen to your opinion. and what have the arctic monkeys got to do with the kooks. they are too completely different bands

Joe55 

Apr 16, 2008

I have to say, I agree that this is a poor review. I haven't heard the album yet but I will; probably out of loyalty to the band as I liked the first record but from what I have heard it sounds like a let down on all fronts. In terms of the review, it reads more like a who's who of the world that NME loves.....bands like Good Shoes, etc..... Arctic Monkeys and Biffy are real, proper bands that should be given the time, not these other Topman bands.

thatllbetheday 

Apr 16, 2008

i compleatly disagree with this review, i just bought konk today and its a fantastic album. its at least a 7/10. usually nme is pretty decent with their review i find but this one is totally off.

jordnz 

Apr 16, 2008

Well Soundedd i didn't use this review as a way to take a dig at Arctic Monkeys i was just exspressing my point. Exactly like Valvetronix said every music writter is on the Arctic Monkey's nut. But the thing is i don't really see why though. If they had never come around the Kooks would be big. This album is pure class but hopefully they will only get better in time.

Foo4michael 

Apr 16, 2008

the riff from always where i need to be sounds alot like 'I found out' by the pigeon detectives....?

phil_7000 

Apr 16, 2008

Im glad to see this album get 5/10...its half way, average, could try better...which after seeing the Kooks live last year mirrors there boring performance. Similar to Hard-Fi & Kaiser Cheifs im sick of em glogging up the radio - just piss off. and come on, its not like every song on the first album was a classic - far from it. I normally dont really agree with NME's reviews, generally there a load of bull but this time I tend to agree, even though albums like this with me would start on about minus 5 before id even heard it simply because of who they are and how they've hurt my ears in the past!

Soundedd 

Apr 16, 2008

Kaiser Chiefs & Hard-Fi are two of the best in the world right now and having seen them both live I can tell you, they are piping hot, both delivered great sets. phil_7000, if I could so kindly ask, what drizzle do you listen to in your spare time?

adno11 

Apr 16, 2008

Come on the Kaiser Chiefs are rubbish, they sing about nothing then just add what they think are catchy chorus's that don't fit in with the song. I can't beleive they've got away with it for so long. They suck live and always sound out of sync, as for Rickys vocals well.............

Valvetronix 

Apr 16, 2008

4ForMichael......... if it does, well i can tell you that always where i need to be, was claled always willing to be, and the kooks have bene playing it for over a year now, and pigeon detectives album was out last year, so i think they would have coppied. ive never heard it just saying its been out over a year.

Valvetronix 

Apr 16, 2008

i compared the kooks and monkeys because everyone seems to compare them, and their album releases where at a similar time.

foggyonthenet 

Apr 16, 2008

i've not listened to the new album yet... but can i just say how disappointed i am with NME recently. i totally agree with what somebody said about mariah carey and estelle. talentless popular culture and its a shambles they are called 'artists' as they have about as much musical talent 50 cent. on reading this review im gonna buy the album as generally i disagree with what NME say. the good thing about the kooks is that people from any genre's can enjoy them. i'm an indie fan and once you get over the fact its more like indie-pop then i think they're impressive.The Kooks = decentArctice monkeys = goodThe Libertines, Dirty Pretty Things and The Babyshambles = brilliance!

Soundedd 

Apr 17, 2008

I simply have to respond to ando11. Kaiser Chiefs are awsome, fantastic live, they rocked the roof off the Birmingham NIA last November and I was there to see it, they are easily one of the best Indie bands of the last 3 or 4 years, why have a pop at them or Hard-Fi, this is a Kooks review, stick on topic.

pjewell 

Apr 17, 2008

I agree with a lot of the comments NME has made about the kooks and their album, but I don't read too much into music, if its catchy, I tend to like it and some of the songs are but yes i think the kooks are wannabe indie. And i agree with foggyonthenet, the libertines are amazing and the babyshambles too but the dirty pretty things are pretty boring. Also, the arctic monkeys are far better than the kooks in every way, NME only favour them because they are more talented!

oasisnblur 

Apr 17, 2008

Disappointed by this album. Not bat but i expected better! The end is boring. But i like the 2nd CD in the limited edition, Rak. Maybe i'm dissapointed because of the last album i bought : Oracular spectacular by MGMT! This album is Awesome, it deserves 9,5/10 at least!

cpbrophy 

Apr 17, 2008

spot on Nme this really is a crap album I'm not surprised the kooks have never really been that good anyway theres already another brighton band that are better than them bring on the macabees

kdewey 

Apr 17, 2008

What a terrible review! Best cd put out in the past 6 months.

oasisfan2206 

Apr 18, 2008

I livei n the states and I have been awaiting this album for a long time. I saw the Kooks back in May of 07' and they played some of the tracks off of Konk and I was so excited for this album because the songs were so great live. When I got the album however I was a little let down. It just didn't seem the same as ththe last albumey were live. This album was tons slower and shall I say, more "feminine", if that makes any sense. After a few listens of the album through though I actually enjoy it now. "Always Where I Need To Be", "Sway" and "Gap" are standouts on it, but there are other great songs on Konk as well. I don't really listen to reviews because I don't believe you can listen to an album once and have a full grasp on it. All I can say if your a big fan of the Kooks go out and pick this up, you'll probably enjoy it.

Joe55 

Apr 18, 2008

kdewey....how on earth can you say that this is the best album put out in the last six months.....what about the new releases from REM, Biffy, MGMT, Foals etc.? Actually to be fair i'm not a big fan of MGMT seeing as they are seriously diluted prog rock and a little over hyped by everyone....still a better album. Not saying that Konk is terrible but have some sense man!

marzy100 

Apr 18, 2008

Why is everyone comparing theM to other bands? The fact is there debut album was immense and this is an excellent album aswell, maybe not to the level of there 1st but still plenty of top tunes. Listen to GAP and argue otherwise? as for the kooks live, his voice is nigh on perfect! saw the band at newcastle academy and they were bang on that night. think everyone should remember how hard it is to get an 2nd album as good as there debut, they dont get the time .....just ask the best 5 bands of the last 20years.......stone roses, oasis, strokes, libertines and monkeys!!

beef4eva 

Apr 18, 2008

OMG!!! this albums brill,ok so its not the BEST ever but still great,why are people comparing them to other bands? there the kooks thats why they all have DIFFRENT NAMES!!!!!

Sonny.D 

Apr 21, 2008

This album is really good. why are people reading this review if they don't like the kooks? really there is hardly any point listening to what NME say...granted i took there advice on Glasvegas and they are awesome but their album reviews have really sliped lately (foals deserved an 8 and so does this) 'always...', 'stormy weather' and tick of time are among the many high points. and the alphabet reading isnt because a lack of lyrics - its relevant to the song

wowzer555 

Apr 21, 2008

i seem to remember the nme having its head firmly up the ass of the kooks for many a summer over the last few years. funny they should now dismiss their second album (which is no better or worse than their first) as a work of treachory.

joeld 

Apr 21, 2008

Ziggychaz - if the pub game were indie snobbery surely they'd be lauding the spate of indie mediocrity (which for once they havent) we av atm and criticising personally far more interesting new stuff like; Gnarls Barkley, MGMT, Hot chip etc..People need to calm down the Kooks arent as evil as Nazi Germany or the best band in the world theyre just...O.K. Well done NME for once.

pauli1980 

Apr 21, 2008

the pub game is really just so stupid that it`s not even worth to make a comment on that. The review doesn`t make that much sense either, if you sort of liked the first album, you can hardly be that disappointed by this one, they`re pretty much alike and I think that "Konk" is almost as good as "Inside in/Inside out".

willcanfly 

Apr 22, 2008

Seriously NME get your head out of your arse, this pub game shit. The names you mentioned such as Pigeon Detectives, Razorlight ect are good bands. You just need to protect your fucking huge ego. Let go of the stupid image in your head of you being the kind of arseholes who don't like popular music. Shut Up

Valvetronix 

Apr 24, 2008

i suppose NME should start giving 5/10 for every album that hits the number 1 spot?

kylia5862 

Apr 25, 2008

V.accurate review...totally deserved a 5

Kookmother 

Apr 28, 2008

To echo Valvetronix point, number 1 in the chart says it all. This album is a cracker. Sway is a tune. The kooks have done what they've always been good at, the ability to write a bloody good tune that you can have a dance and a sing-a-long to. The fact that NME gave this is a 5 is a joke and it's reviews like this that highlight the music sheep in this world, you know who you are. The point of music is not just to be experimental and produce shite (cough, Last Shadow Puppets, i mean Age of the Understatement is a great but the rest of the album is the same) but to make you feel emotion and that no matter whats happening to you, you can put on a CD and feel good. Though i disagree with all the arctics hate thats cropping up here, they are one of the best bands in the world, its just a shame that Alex walked into that 2 for 1 barber and met Miles Kane. Hopefully this will make him up his game for the 3rd Arctics album.

definetly_music 

Apr 28, 2008

i think is a fantastic album, they deserve more tha 5. at least 7it has fantastic songs like "see the sun" and "mr.maker".i would prefer that max would be the bassist, but the new one is noy bad

wickerdude 

Apr 28, 2008

i for think this is a great album, i wasn't too keen to start with but after a few listens it really grows on you... i dont think the kooks will ever push the boudaries of music but they are good at what they do and i hope they continue doing it for a long time... stand out tracks for me are.... see the sun.... shine on and sway....just give it a chance people, i'm sure you'll grow to love it

wickerdude 

Apr 28, 2008

i for think this is a great album, i wasn't too keen to start with but after a few listens it really grows on you... i dont think the kooks will ever push the boudaries of music but they are good at what they do and i hope they continue doing it for a long time... stand out tracks for me are.... see the sun.... shine on and sway....just give it a chance people, i'm sure you'll grow to love it

wickerdude 

Apr 28, 2008

i for think this is a great album, i wasn't too keen to start with but after a few listens it really grows on you... i dont think the kooks will ever push the boudaries of music but they are good at what they do and i hope they continue doing it for a long time... stand out tracks for me are.... see the sun.... shine on and sway....just give it a chance people, i'm sure you'll grow to love it

detheo 

Apr 30, 2008

Why are people even talking about Arctic Monkeys and Kaiser Chiefs?Anyway, the review's harsh. I suspect a lot of it has to do with the fact that it sounds 'cool' to slag the Kooks off. Granted, Konk sounds a lot like Inside In/Inside Out, it's nothing we haven't heard before, the lyrics aren't groundbreaking etc. But Pritchard's 'slurred' voice? Sway, 'a mess'? Really? It's a beautiful track, and so are 'Gap' (a truly emotional one, my favourite) and 'See the Sun'. Surely the album deserves more than just 5?

indiejessie 

May 1, 2008

I've noticed that alot of people have called this review harsh, and to be honest most of the time i don't agree with nme's reviews, but i have to say this one is spot on. I really looked forward to this album for ages and I loved the first one. I don't care if people say that the Kooks are a hyped up, commercial, mainstream indie band, you have to say that the first album proved that they have alot of potential. For a first album Inside In/Inside Out was pretty damn good. But Konk, I hate to say is a poor follow up... And I honestly have given Konk a chance, I have listened to it again and again over the past few weeks and tried to get into it. But it just lacks depth, the tracks work individually but not as an album, and it's obvious that they want to SELL this album. For me it just scrapes the surface of what they're are capable of. I have to say the opening track See the Sun (my personal fav) is great as is the closing one, Tick of Time which captures what the Kooks are really about. But

andrew_ward 

May 1, 2008

I personally don't agree with the review at all, I went to see the Kooks live in Sheffield on Monday night and it was a great gig, they were awesome and the sell out crowd there loved the new and old songs equally, so if that isn't the sign of a good album i don't know what is? It does seem that it is cool to go against popular bands these days, the kooks had a successful first album and now everyone likes them, so many people are now deciding to go against this to be different? Definately worth more than a 5!

spaze75 

May 2, 2008

wasted talents...bad album.bring.agree with NME in that case.

morrissey07 

May 15, 2008

I'd like to point out that Leonie Cooper has read one too many Pitchfork Media reviews because this resembles that of an over bloated PM review that some English 102 taking hypster living in Silverlake would write.Secondly, comparisons to other bands isn't necessarily a bad thing. It can be rather helpful when understanding a "new" band that someone has yet to discover. The Kooks are suffering from a severe form of backlash. NME are infamous for doing such things (ie: Morrissey in the early 90's)An honestly, why take seriously someone who thinks Lily Allen is "creative" Nothing wrong with Lily Allen, but if it wasn't for myspace and the touch of Mark Ronson, where would she be? Nowhere fast.

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday

  • Breaking News stories
  • All you need to know about the week's NME magazine
  • Live, Album and Track reviews
  • Tip offs about the most important Gigs
  • All the latest NME.COM video exclusives

Every Friday

  • NME.COM's free mini-magazine
  • Gig listings for the weekend
  • All the most important Album and Track reviews
  • The week's biggest News stories
  • Competitions - with exclusive music prizes
  • plus loads more!

In The Magazine

This Week's Issue
  • The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • Agenda-setting news and fiery comment
  • Must-read interviews with the planet's hottest bands
  • Hundreds of UK gigs listed every week
  • Unrivalled access to the artists that matter
  • Subscribe today and get 1/3rd off NME