First For Music News

Album review: Editors - 'In This Light And On This Evening'

Neither Tesco angst fish nor dark art fowl

Can it really be this bad living with Edith Bowman? A dispute over nappy-changing: “You’ll get old and die here… you’ll choke, choke on the air you try to breathe”. Edith shaves her legs and doesn’t rinse the bath: “If there really was a God here/He’d have raised a hand by now”. Edith comes home spannered after a night on the lash with George Lamb: “You ran with the dead today/With the moles from the CIA/They say more than you ever say”.

Searching for authenticity in gloom is an irresponsible occupation: after all, the expectation that artists should live up to their angst was surely a factor in both Richey Manic’s ‘4 Real’ carve-up and Kurt Cobain’s demise. So, are Editors, on their third album, doing more than wallowing in mawkish bombast and “living out our secondhand clichés”, as they put it on ‘Like Treasure’? Well, yes and no. While a band that operates in their arena-sized realm is never going to take a Throbbing Gristle-style experimental leap, there’s no doubt that, in their own way, they’ve pushed the boat out far beyond the shallow emoting of ‘An End Has A Start’. That much is clear from the opening title track, heavily if deliberately dystopian through Smith’s bottom-end vocals and the electronic flicker of a panicked Morse transmission.

Despite its guffawsome Radiohead-aping title, ‘Eat Raw Meat = Blood Drool’ also surprises with android duck calls, Kraftwerk synths and the kind of mysterious chorus Bono long ago forgot how to write. Single ‘Papillon’ is adequate Gahan-near-death-period Depeche Mode. Editors get it entirely right on ‘The Big Exit’, which features awkwardly slowed no-wave guitar and martial drums that dream of being produced by Martin Hannett, a noise like waking up to a circular saw bearing down on your sleepy eyes. The bass keeps up a decent rumble underneath, while a refrain of “They took what once was ours” passes final judgment. ‘Bricks And Mortar’ builds a house not far from where The Horrors sited ‘Primary Colours’ in the Neu! World, even if it ultimately typifies Editors’ malaise. Instead of just making do with a motorik intent and the occasional slicing synth to sharpen the edge of its stadium-bothering chorus, they throw in multi-tracked choral vocals, warm keyboards and a bothersome amount of guitar tracks. The effect is akin to being in three different indie clubs at once.

Those who’ve perfected epic gloom – The Cure, Joy Division, ‘Holy Bible’-era Manics – have ground the atmosphere out of minimalism, stripping everything back and hitting you hard between the eyes. ‘In This Light…’ suggests that Editors could yet push their trolley out of Ikea existentialism into a ditch of twisted metal, weeds and wires with the potential of finding something beneath. Indeed, they’ve possibly succeeded in alienating the casual fan with the brief moments of nastiness that are here. And with those people diverted back to Keane’s mooning lullabies, perhaps next time Editors might look to their dark forebears, discover the power of concision and hone what they have. For, as any good editor knows, less is more.

Luke Turner

What do you think of the album? Let us know by posting a comment below

5 out of 10
 

More Reviews of Editors - In This Light And On This Evening

 
 

Comments (6)

Add a comment

lemoncakelet 

Oct 13, 2009

The anger over the tragic wrongness of this review was diluted by the rather hilarious first paragraph. Perhaps Mr Turner should turn to comedy, he wouldn't know the best album of 2009 if it hit him in the face. It just has...

Clujj 

Oct 14, 2009

I agree with lemoncakelet, definitely one of the best albums of 2009, and one of the worst reviews of 2009... And please, stop talking about the lyrics. They aren't that bad, I find them rather good actually. Gloom lyrics aren't necessarily bad, and a lot of the best poets wrote the saddest and the darkest poems (see The Raven by Poe, or some poems by Wordsworth or William Blake for instance...). Besides, if you start to focus on lyrics analysis, tell me what you think of “Love, love me do. You know I love you, I'll always be true, So please, love me do. Whoa, love me do.” Seems a bit shallow innit? Yet, this is a good song by one of the greatest band of all time. You've just done a very common mistake: thinking that something that is beyond your reach is bad. Next time, don't flee and don't hide the shallowness of your review behind humour. Just get into it in depth, just face the difficulty, just do your job properly. But don't worry, try hard and I'm sure, when you are grown up, you'll succeed...

madmax2b 

Oct 15, 2009

i am a big editors fan,but this aint album of 2009,but it aint bad,however the editors will make it great live show,the editors allways have been a live band,it only way to hear them and they didnt over do the snys{like muse did this time round}so good album lads, keep the live show rocking

revos 

Oct 15, 2009

its a good album nme got it wrong for me and editors are awesome live and i think the new songs will be mega live

drcloons 

Oct 19, 2009

I think everyone has missed the most important point, which is that if Editors continue their current trend their 11th album will have only one track

LoftusRoad 

Oct 21, 2009

I only made my way through half the album, got bored and listened to the new Flaming Lips instead.NME reviews rarely get it right but in this case, bang on the money - except the word "dull" should have been used a lot more.

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox: