First For Music News

Album review: Marilyn Manson - 'The High End Of Low'

'God of fuck', we can take, man boobs, fine... but feelings? No, ta

The best thing that ever happened to Marilyn Manson was when Bowling For Columbine revealed that behind the Antichrist Superstar was an intelligent, sensitive man. It was also the worst thing that ever happened to him. The modern tragedy for cultural outsiders is not to be reviled, but to be accepted.

After the film, his mystique as the ‘God Of Fuck’, scourge of society dissipated; he was understood, even appreciated and the game’s been up ever since. After the underrated, siege mentality paranoid mania of 2000’s ‘Holy Wood (In The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death)’, he’s floundered, releasing hokey cover singles, while drifting into gossip pages.

‘The High End Of Low’ follows on from 2007’s ‘Eat Me, Drink Me’ in developing a more personal approach. It’s been a fatal mistake. This album is full of self-pitying dirges which give the impression of a slightly sad man-child sulking about girls in his bedroom. “Anyone with half a soul will hear this and never leave me”, he whines on ‘15’. He repeatedly drifts into soft rock ballads, with ‘Running To The Edge Of The World’ marking an embarrassing nadir. By opening up, he’s totally emasculated himself. He sounds defeated, like a man who knows he’s been drained of his shock value by Twilight-style mainstream co-option. Now even his most aggressive moments such as ‘Pretty As A Swastika’ seem oddly conservative.

Only on ‘We’re From America’ do we see the old spunky, hypocrisy-bating furious lunatic. Marilyn Manson was
an invention designed to provoke American society and it worked spectacularly well. To suddenly be shown the lonely little man behind the mask, well, it’s shocking, but not in the intended way.

Martin Robinson

3 out of 10
 
 
 

Comments (4)

Add a comment

B LARGH 

May 26, 2009

This is a load of rubbish. Just review the music like a PROPER magazine instead of going on about what he should or should not be doing at his age. The reviewer had predjudices from the start: it was obvious. NMEs really gone down the toilet.

Blackmountain 

May 28, 2009

That felt like a flagrant stupidity. C’mon man, seems like you miss good old Manson’s controversies so bad. But isn't it embarrassing when an artist stalls and gets boring, even if his goal is to shock? But the review was to marginalize the protagonist. If High End was all blasts of sacrilege and provocation, the reviewer would tell us Manson was repeating himself. The record really has this sharply personal approach. And if Manson traded earlier slaps for the expression of personal feeling in a bunch of lyrical songs, that's HIS choice as an artists and the only review mission is supposed to evaluate the delivery of it, not carping about the emotion itself. How about other stuff on the record? How about music side of it? I never got any near to be Manson fan whatsoever, but I simply can’t buy this blatant attempt of the review to rebuff the guy's good job. For anyone interested http://listenofthis.livejournal.com/

sariel 

Jun 9, 2009

This is by far the most inaccurate and poorly written review that i have read in year.Is this fox news im not sure, the latest effort from Marilyn Manson is by far the best studio album that he has created in the last 10 years. I thought that this site was about the music not the lifestyle choices of the artist. Maybe someone more qualified should be writing the reviews from now on.

redup 

Jun 15, 2009

There is some sense in reviewManson should have stopped 7 or 8 years ago. He's now turned into the worst parody of himself.Surprised that anyone still gives a fuck...

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox:

Marilyn Manson CDs