NME Reviews

The Long Blondes

Couples

Looking back, it’s clear The Long Blondes were never all about the music. The image, the affectations, the snappy dressing, the kitschy pop-cultural loves, the Bonnie And Clyde-referencing cover art, sure, but not the music. ‘Someone To Drive You Home’ came out just that little bit too late to cash in on the excitement of those early singles. It was a functional record that failed to really wow. Sure, it had the catchy choruses and the wry, well-phrased lyrics but it wasn’t outlandish nor as heart-grabbingly essential as we had hoped for.

However, like Mystery Jets, they’d attracted the attentions of Erol Alkan and had been working on a handful of mysterious, exciting B-sides. ‘Who Are You To Her?’ and ‘Five Ways To End It’ suggested they were heading in a thrilling, dancefloor-loving new direction. The Long Blondes went slinky disco. It felt like they’d found the music to match everything they were about. So ‘“Couples”’ (don’t forget the quotation marks, we’ll get to those in a minute), long before it was even recorded, promised a lot.

Fast-forward to the album’s arrival and something is awry in Blondes land. This should be an incredible piece of work. Erol is still on production duties. The band claim a love for the Pet Shop Boys and the inimitable Glass Candy. They’re promising to look to the future instead of the past. It’s even – deep breath – a concept album. Not a horrible one about space monsters and the apocalypse, as they all seem to be, but one about famous 20th century couples: The Two Ronnies, Basil and Sybil Fawlty, Richard and Judy, Gazza and Jimmy Fivebellies, Chris Evans and Billie Piper, Gilbert and George… this should make for a smart, informed, modern record that’s lofty enough to sit high on its deserved pop pedestal.

‘“Couples”’, however, doesn’t feel right. It’s not a terrible record but it is a disappointing one. Whereas once they sang of suburban boredom tempered with the thrill of escape, now they’ve started to sound like they’d be happy to stay put. ‘Erin O’Connor’, one of the catchiest tunes here, is sullied by its baffling model-based lyrics: “Close your eyes and think of Erin O’Connor/I’ll pretend I’m Lily Cole”. ‘Here Comes The Serious Bit’ is a sloppy shout-fest that’s grating rather than defiant. ‘Round The Hairpin’, a dark stab at krautrock, highlights the band’s musical inadequacies with a plodding dirge that flaps around before ending up right back where it started. ‘I Liked The Boys’, which rhymes “boys” with “boy” and sounds as half-finished as its couplets (they have a habit of this – see ‘Weekend Without Makeup’’s “two very different things”). With a bit more work, a bit more polish, a bit more something, they could have pulled off these adventurous musical diversions. As it stands, ‘“Couples”’ is messy and inconsistent. That said, in places, the magic does happen. ‘Century’ is a cracking first single, a future-disco whirl that reins in Kate’s bombastic vocals to stunning effect, before descending into tongue-in-cheek, stabbing Gary Numan synths. ‘Too Clever By Half’ and ‘Nostalgia’, the most forward-looking songs on the album, are bravely understated. You suspect a year ago they would have got the full Kate Jackson lung assault, but after Jarvis Cocker compared her vocals not so favourably to Barbra Streisand, she’s far more restrained. It means that ‘Nostalgia’ in particular, is a fittingly elegiac and lovely song that is effortlessly grown-up.

That effortlessness is sadly absent for too much of the album – and that’s the main problem. The Long Blondes should be a band to adore, but ‘“Couples”’ resists that at every turn. The knowing, heavy-handed detachment of those quotation marks reinforces this inexplicable coldness that threatens to demolish the album’s ambition. In one of the promotional YouTube clips there’s an explanation of the record’s theme: “‘“Couples”’ is an homage to the mundanities of love,” apparently. Despite the occasional flashes of brightness, it sounds like they’ve taken that brief to heart.

Rebecca Nicholson

6 out of 10

Comments (7)

Add a comment

liveon35mm 

Apr 13, 2008

So let's put like this.Everyone complaining when a band does a sophomore album that is just a selection of out-tracks of the debut.-Than it comes that a band is brave and give a twist to their music, and people is disoriented and end up with a 6/10 just because it doesn't find what was expecting.-difficult to satisfy jornalists, nowadays.-I am not a fan neither of cheery pop or electro pop, but this album is good and live they put on one of the best show of britain's new bands.-check them live on liveon35mm.com

Jamie LOLerton 

Apr 14, 2008

"Whereas once they sang of suburban boredom tempered with the thrill of escape, now they’ve started to sound like they’d be happy to stay put."You make this sound like a criticism. Except it shouldn't be. It's a sign that the Long Blondes have grown up; clearly the NME hasn't and perhaps it never can. How tedious.

enigmatica 

Apr 14, 2008

First of all, in reference to Someone To Drive You Home:"Sure, it had the catchy choruses and the wry, well-phrased lyrics but it wasn’t outlandish nor as heart-grabbingly essential as we had hoped for."Excuse me, WHAT? Does Rebecca Nicholson know something that most long-term readers of NME don't? If memory serves me correctly, this publication gave their first album a score of NINE!!!!!!! So what on earth is she on about?And as for the comments about "Couples", well, everyone's entitled to their opinion. I believe that if they'd put out the same album again, they would have got slated for it.It's nice to see a band try something different and break the mould. Personally, I think that the band HAVE improved musically, based upon what I've heard on the album and seeing them live. And it's good to see and hear Kate singing in different types of ways, other than just the foghorn. Frankly, I find it ludicrous that the insinuation has been made that she changed things just because "Uncle Jarvis" made negative comments.Seems to me as if Nicholson has just dismissed this album and not realised its true potential, or indeed, the main point of it all.

kingofthemooners 

Apr 15, 2008

As much as I love the Long Blondes I would have given this album about a 6/10. It was a bit disappointing although a stark and brave departure from the first album, plus I loved and still do love Century. However this review is still completely shit despite the right score.Nicholson says the STDYH "was a functional record that failed to really wow", yet as someone else has said, NME rated it a 9/10 saying it was pretty much the best thing ever ever ever. God. Make your mind up. Just because this isn't middle of the road indie wank, doesn't mean it's rubbish.

patto678 

Apr 16, 2008

i was so dissapointed with this album.theres like no tunes whatsoever!hopefully some will appear after a few more listens but im fukin appalled! (maybe its the fact theyre shite musicians)and as for kate's new look, put the old one back on and then you may marry. the end.

joeld 

Apr 21, 2008

Im sorry kingofthemooners this is quite 'MOR indie wank'

soundwave87 

Apr 21, 2008

I wasn't overly impressed by the Long Blondes debut, and have found this a much more exciting and dynamic album. The last two tracks alone are worth the entry price as they are marvellous! What is interesting is reading the mixed reviews - I may be getting on (I'm 29), but so many bands have to get it right on their first album to survive these days that any longevity or chance to develop seems to be stifled by hype and an over whelming expectation on young bands to hit paydirt from the get go. I thought things were bad in the Britpop era of the '90s, when new bands struggled to make three albums, now they're lucky to get the chance to make a second. For The Long Blondes bravery and experimentation I'm giving this a 9/10. They've made a bloody great pop record, and whats wrong with that?

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday

  • Breaking News stories
  • All you need to know about the week's NME magazine
  • Live, Album and Track reviews
  • Tip offs about the most important Gigs
  • All the latest NME.COM video exclusives

Every Friday

  • NME.COM's free mini-magazine
  • Gig listings for the weekend
  • All the most important Album and Track reviews
  • The week's biggest News stories
  • Competitions - with exclusive music prizes
  • plus loads more!

In The Magazine

This Week's Issue
  • The ultimate guide to the week in music
  • Agenda-setting news and fiery comment
  • Must-read interviews with the planet's hottest bands
  • Hundreds of UK gigs listed every week
  • Unrivalled access to the artists that matter
  • Subscribe today and get 1/3rd off NME