First For Music News

The Vines

Melodia

Let’s get this out of the way, because it’s not something we’re too fond of doing. To those of you who bought the issue of NME dated July 23, 2002, please accept our sincerest and most unreserved apologies. Some of you may remember this issue as the one where we proclaimed a mentally imbalanced Antipodean as the de facto saviour of rock’n’roll and proceeded to indulge, over the course of innumerable pages and in a near-scientific discourse (right down to a diagram detailing how his watch – his watch – bestowed messianic power upon him) on why we were right. Well, we weren’t. The fault for the lonely winding down of The Vines’ curious career doesn’t lie solely at our feet – Craig Nicholls was always too trigger-happy with the self-destruct button to ensure that – but we certainly played our part. And for that we’re sorry. But nobody deserved ‘Melodia’.

The Vines’ fourth album, which they’re streaming free from their MySpace, contains only two songs that last longer than 150 seconds, yet listening to it feels like a lifetime of Chinese water torture. It opens with ‘Get Out’, a song Craig Nicholls has already written on at least three occasions, and each time – since ‘Get Free’s patent was approved – with diminishing levels of success. From here, things simply get worse; ‘Autumn Shade III’ mistakenly assumes the world was waiting for a denouement to a trilogy that was starting to sound dreary after the first few listens to part one, while, seven listens in, we’re still at a loss to say anything, good or bad, about the vapid ‘Braindead’.

For an album called ‘Melodia’ written by a self-confessed Beatles fanatic who once penned the gorgeous ‘Homesick’ and ‘Winning Days’, actual melodies are rare and most, like ‘Hey’ or the turgid ‘She Is Gone’, sound embryonic at best. There are seeds of good ideas to be found in ‘He’s A Rocker’’s Kinksian grunge motif and ‘Orange Amber’’s rough-edged approximation of REM, but ‘A Girl I Knew’ is the album’s only real highlight, with Nicholls opening up and talking in something other than vague metaphors about “Living off of coke and brew” over a ghostly acoustic march. If this you think this sounds like us burying the hatchet into The Vines’ spinal cord, you’re wrong. They were never the saviours of rock’n’roll we said they’d be, but we had hoped for a return – however slight – to ‘Highly Evolved’ form. We hoped in vain.

Barry Nicolson

4 out of 10
 
 
 

Comments (25)

Add a comment

matt brisbane 

Aug 11, 2008

another piece of shit nme review. it is a great listen.you got your head up your arse ya dos arrogant prick. not a saviour of rock and roll but that was your shitty idea

misterpete316 

Aug 11, 2008

the apology is appreciated (as is the entertaining review). i went to see this lot on the strength of that issue. shocking rubbish, so it was - i left when they started to chunter through 'ms jackson'. the watch diagram should've been a dead giveaway.

bragdad 

Aug 11, 2008

Big Suprise, the NME originally rating a band only to dismiss them as soon as they become less popular/older, because thats never happened before!!!This guy brings Craig Nicholls illness into the review? why? in some sort of attempt to justify the NME now disliking them.According to the reviewer get out’ is apparently the same song as get free, but if he's listened to the track properly, the only actual similarity is the word "get"?? where do the NME hire these morons?He also says that winning days is a great track, but the NME also slated that album back in the day. I know it was probably a different reviwer back in the day but you'd expect them to do some research."They were never the saviours of rock’n’roll we said they’d be..." What, do they reckon because they said this its gonna be true, they proclaim bands as saviours of rock and roll every week and they never are!! They said the datsuns were going to be and although a good band they're clearly not saviours of rock and roll.I think the album is great, not as good as vision valley, but better than winning days, and who cares if the

somecoolusername 

Aug 11, 2008

I don't think it's very fair to dismiss Craig as 'mentally imbalanced' and say it as if it is a way to insult the band when you very well know he has Asperger's Syndrome and since diagnosis has adapted his lifestyle to suit his advice and treatment. The way you speak about this is quite distasteful and largely irrelevant to the music.I don't think you did hope for a return to form for The Vines - I think you jumped at any excuse to slate Craig and his band. If you genuinely didn't like the album, I think you could have worded your argument better, rather than not actually talking in any depth about any of the songs until half way through the final paragraph. A disappointing, dismissive and largely biased review, something I feel this magazine has been doing too much recently eg The Vines Best Of, 5 O' Clock Heroes - Who - you do not mention the music once in this particular review, how do you expect to be taken seriously?In this review alone you contradict yourselves, saying you were wrong about The Vines saving rock in 2002 but you want a return to the form of

wellduhobviously 

Aug 11, 2008

Give it a few years and you'll realise what utter discordant toss everything Pete D's put out is too.

interpolluter28 

Aug 11, 2008

The Vines feel more like the album where Craig Nicholls simply likes to have fun both rocking and making music. So, Craig Nicholls IS probably the wrong person to pin as rock n' roll savior. Nonetheless, the album is alright, if you can get past how ADD the album does seem. (In the album, they do switch from lying in the sun to karate kicking ahred happy tunes right when you blink.)

Fuzzy Logic 

Aug 11, 2008

I am appalled, but not surprised, at this lacklustre review, seeing as the respect I had for NME has evaporated very quickly in recent months. It was inevitable that this NME 'reviewer' was encouraged by its employer to slate 'Melodia.' To actually give this album a review it deserves would be going against the principles of NME of late; it would require a professionalism that NME reporters are completely alien to. Basically you've dug your own grave here. Vision Valley, The Vines's third offering in 2006 was given 7/10. This despite the fact that the album consisted of a handful of demos, and the songs are even shorter than the ones on Melodia. So the length of the songs on Melodia shouldn't even be an issue, and the reviewer's failure to acknowledge this, has damaged the integrity of NME, and made the hole that your magazine is disappearing into even blacker.Personally I think Melodia is as close to Highly Evolved as Nicholl's has ever been. Opening rockers 'Get Out' and 'Manger' show the solid quality fans of The Vines will be delighted with. They may well sound like songs Nicholls 'has already written on at least three occasions,' but it's

Mansion 

Aug 11, 2008

Hello? Has anyone here listened to this album? It's tossbags. A world away from the highs of their debut. Just a typical tale of a band who had three great ideas, then spent the rest of their career repeating them.

binhawk 

Aug 11, 2008

I have often wondered If any of the employees at the NME are disciplined by the internal NME hierarchy for some of the 'reviews' they write. Fair enough as a Vines fan I can safely this is not the best album in the world. However on this occassion all you have succeeded in doing is mereley proving one thing. Since any band has been tagged as 'the next big thing' NME get so needlessly overly super excited about them, hype them up then after a few albums drag them through the gutter in an almost jealous 'I wish I was in a band' rage. This review indicates your own self indulgence and your clear undeserved arrogance. I dare you to re write review without mentioning the poor lads disease, earlier albums and without any silly grovelling apologies. For those who agree with me, read the Idlewild best of review. Shambles. You lot are your own worst enemies....

azza1978 

Aug 11, 2008

Please everyone do not take any notce of this review, its a disgrace! just like alot of NME reviews ive read recently, Melodia is a very solid album, in fact its there best since Highly Evolved, thats for sure, its a major return to form for Craig, I live in Ausralia and ive seen them live a couple of times recently and i have to say, the turn around in Craigs performances are quite remarkable, i saw them a few years ago and it was a train wreck, Craig was totally off the planet. But now the band a very tight, Craig sings properly, and they just KICK ASS LIVE! the two concerts i saw nearly tore the roof down it was crazy! they really are a live band, there albums dont give them any justice, you can say what you like about Craig Nicholls, hes just a kickass frontman, who has a real presence on stage, The Vines really need a live album, something i would not have said a few years back, When they come over to tour the UK, go and see them, its a must, you will be pleasantly surprised how good they really are, Craig

chrischeney 

Aug 12, 2008

Somebody fire this guy, will they? what a dreadful review. It barely talks about the music on the album and any criticism is barely based on the music at all. It's a great album and surely deserves more than it has been given. How you can give this 4/10 and call a band like the ting tings talented is just plain idiocy. It's because of bands like the vines that proper rock continues to be made and influence new artists. We're going to regret 80's revival like we have always regretted and been embarrassed by the 80s. C'mon NME, stop celebrating mediocrity, stop proclaiming everything as the new saviours of music or the best band ever and start writing well written, well argued critiques.

Elliott_Decihells 

Aug 12, 2008

I reckon the fans should have their own page to review bands, the nme would save so much money rather than employing monkeys that do not do their research. It would be great to have our own review page!

human-seagull 

Aug 12, 2008

I love the new album, does it matter what this guy thinks? If Craig Nicholls was to off himself tommorow nme would declare it the greatest piece of work since the white album. Hope they play a few UK shows this year

animal_machine 

Aug 13, 2008

If NME hates it, then it has to be damn good and different!A Girl I Knew is the only song I find lacking, and this guys marks it as the only decent stuff...If you go through other magazines reviews, they're mostly fair, good.

wasted_time 

Aug 14, 2008

well, i agree that the album is a far cry from 'highly evolved', yet its not as bad as four out of ten. Yes there are some terrible songs on there, yet the good songs are actually well worth people listening too. The band may not be relevant in your 'cool' magazine anymore, yet how about just not reviewing them.simple.

vonman 

Aug 15, 2008

A terribly fumbled and biased review. Melodia is better than The Subways' new offering and that got 8/10!!! It's also better than Vision Valley and that got 7/10. Also I thought Autumn Shade was a highlight from Highly Evolved??? This review is possibly the biggest piece of drivel I have read from the NME, ever. I don't think you even mentioned how good ''True as the Night'' is!?!?! No wonder sales of this magazine are heading firmly downwards.

joebaia 

Aug 15, 2008

Another NME review gets a slating. Let's face it, it's hardly a surprise either. I've not listened to the album, but even if it does turn out to be terrible it won't make me appreciate this review in the slightest. NME basically builds bands up on pedestals and when they don't turn out to be better than The Beatles and The Rolling Stones combined they dismiss them as rubbish. Who actually cares for NME's opinions any more? Hire some decent journalists with a sense of integrity and realism and this rag of a magazine might be taken seriously.

rubbersoul7 

Aug 15, 2008

Typical shite NME review. These 'reviewers' are a joke. The Vines are head and shoulders above a lot of bands out there but just because they aren't 'cool' anymore they get slated.

Chris_C 

Aug 15, 2008

God knows how long it is since Craig Nicholls last had an original thought, but on the strength of this album, it's been quite a while.

i_stole_your_lp 

Aug 18, 2008

right i would prefer wasting my time staring at a wall than writing this about some shit head review but i need to get one point across, NME focuses on new bands more than old bands back in 2002 NME were wanking the vines for interviews because they were a new band and becauseof their first popular release get free, i am a huge vines fan ive been a huge fan scince their demos came out from highly evolved, i adore every album but enough about my obsession. This Barry Nicolson doesnt even know shit about them he proberly likes two songs by them 'ride' and 'get free' and he got asked to review melodia and he thought "wow im gonna listen to 5 secondes of every song because i know whats good and whats not and here you are giving vines fans a load of shit and giving their album a fucking 4! this guy doesnt know shit about music this album is amazing if you actually listen to all of the songs you will realise that this is an amazing album, but comparing this to highly evolved is just bollocks, so 'Barry' why dont you find someone else

The G-Ster 

Aug 18, 2008

It fascinates me that, as music journalists, you at NME know nothing about music. Or how to write a review for that matter. There are people like me, who might submit the odd review to Sputnik music, who can actually write a more than sufficient review (that people enjoy, might I add), that examines the music instead of de-bollocking the artists. Sack all your reviewers, sack fucking Mark Beaumont, and let the people do the reviewing.

lieutenantcrab 

Aug 27, 2008

Melodia is a perfectly confident record which swaggers through its short but sweet numbers with an air of warm arrogance. The instrumentals are generally summery - Orange Amber - and brisk, but bely the sense of vunerability which permeates the lyrics. Nicholls' delivery is as punchy as ever, yet throughout the album his vocals have a sing-song, innocent, nursery rhyme-ish quality which is an endearing counterpoint to the sway of his guitar. This is particularly obvious on 'He's a Rocker'. If you care to give Nicholls the credit, it is a faux catharsis. It is irony. A self-consciously defiant roar at those who would say that who he is should define his music. Of course this isn't the greatest album ever recorded. It seems to come off half cocked in places. But it comes off nonetheless. Stream it from the myspace and see what you think.

thebee 

Sep 12, 2008

Some points:1) I'm sure it's fun to be disgruntled and grumpy, but this reviewer doesn't get the NME's own joke. I didn't read the original 2002 article, but claiming Craig Nicholls received divine inspiration from his watch is obviously a self-consciously overblown clever journalistic trick. Just as this is in the opposite direction. I'd be curious to know who wrote the original article and what they think of this.2) Once again the British music press cements its reputation for building 'em up and shooting 'em down.3) If anything, NME should apologise for this review. When you're talking about a singer with a fragile ego, this review is not just critical, it's nasty. 4) Rock 'n' roll doesn't need saving. It's an old man who won't die.I give this review 4/10.

Barry Nicolson is a cunt 

Nov 10, 2008

Nuff Sed

stephanesenecaltremblay 

May 25, 2009

haha! man NME doesn't like anything that isn't either brand new popular music, OR PETE DOHERTY. It's hilarious how you guys rip apart so many bands that aren't from the U.K. I'm slowly realising that NME is a really unreliable source for music reviews and music information seeing as all you want to cover is the libertines and if they'll reunite. HOW MANY TIMES CAN YOU REWRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THAT?!

Add your comment

Free weekly music news, videos and MP3s in your inbox:

The Vines CDs