If there’s anything Brexit and Trump’s rise to power has taught us, it’s that those who lurk in the background, opting to stay quiet, are often the ones that eventually bring everything crashing down. It’s true, too, of pop stars and celebrities. When you’re being given a gigantic public platform, silence can seem like complicity, and refusing to vocally support either side automatically feels like a win for the most dangerous (in America’s case, Trump’s Republicans).
This is true of America’s almost painfully pleasant megastar, Taylor Swift. For the past four years, throughout one of the most aggressive political campaigns in America’s modern history, the 28-year-old country-cum-pop star has refused to talk about politics. In fact, she pretty much refused to speak at all, navigating a promo campaign for her last record, ‘Reputation’, that saw her write her own narrative: releasing self-made ‘magazines’ alongside the album and turning her ‘cover story’ with British Vogue into a cringe-inducing poem instead of sitting down with a journalist to talk about her music and, if they had dared question her on it, her unclear political stance, too. It’s the kind of thing that led critics to call her an envoy for Trump’s values and the poster child for white feminism.
As the vast majority of women in pop came out in vocal support of Hillary Clinton, Taylor decided to stay silent. She’s in a unique position: born in Pennsylvania before moving to Tennessee to pursue her country music career, she’s forever been embedded in (and supported by the citizens of) red states. To come out in support of the Democrats back then would embroil her in a backlash that might have put her success in those areas at risk – and that doesn’t sound good when it comes to potential protests at concerts and trying to flog tickets.
That all changed at the weekend, as Swift finally decided to let her guard down and politicise her platform.
View this post on Instagram
I’m writing this post about the upcoming midterm elections on November 6th, in which I’ll be voting in the state of Tennessee. In the past I’ve been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions, but due to several events in my life and in the world in the past two years, I feel very differently about that now. I always have and always will cast my vote based on which candidate will protect and fight for the human rights I believe we all deserve in this country. I believe in the fight for LGBTQ rights, and that any form of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender is WRONG. I believe that the systemic racism we still see in this country towards people of color is terrifying, sickening and prevalent. I cannot vote for someone who will not be willing to fight for dignity for ALL Americans, no matter their skin color, gender or who they love. Running for Senate in the state of Tennessee is a woman named Marsha Blackburn. As much as I have in the past and would like to continue voting for women in office, I cannot support Marsha Blackburn. Her voting record in Congress appalls and terrifies me. She voted against equal pay for women. She voted against the Reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, which attempts to protect women from domestic violence, stalking, and date rape. She believes businesses have a right to refuse service to gay couples. She also believes they should not have the right to marry. These are not MY Tennessee values. I will be voting for Phil Bredesen for Senate and Jim Cooper for House of Representatives. Please, please educate yourself on the candidates running in your state and vote based on who most closely represents your values. For a lot of us, we may never find a candidate or party with whom we agree 100% on every issue, but we have to vote anyway. So many intelligent, thoughtful, self-possessed people have turned 18 in the past two years and now have the right and privilege to make their vote count. But first you need to register, which is quick and easy to do. October 9th is the LAST DAY to register to vote in the state of TN. Go to vote.org and you can find all the info. Happy Voting! ???
“In the past I’ve been reluctant to publicly voice my political opinions, but due to several events in my life and in the world in the past two years, I feel very differently about that now,” she said in an Instagram post that racked up 1.8 million likes in a day. She went on to say that, “[a]s much as I have in the past and would like to continue voting for women in office, I cannot support [her local Republican candidate] Marsha Blackburn. Her voting record in Congress appalls and terrifies me. She voted against equal pay for women. She voted against the Reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, which attempts to protect women from domestic violence, stalking, and date rape. She believes businesses have a right to refuse service to gay couples. She also believes they should not have the right to marry. These are not MY Tennessee values.” It’s an admirable moment for an artist who’s finally recognised that her silence could be considered damaging to her younger generation of fans. And for someone with such a strong following of teenage women – many of whom don’t have the right to vote yet – she’s set an example, and helped change the priorities of a generation so often dismissed in the political conversation.
But here’s my issue: Taylor Swift waited for the sweetest moment to make her political position clear. The album cycle for ‘Reputation’ draws to a close and the slew of singles worth releasing from it dried up long ago. Her behemoth US tour, which passed through plenty of red states on the way, finally wrapped merely days before she made her announcement. Sure, it coincided rightly with the November midterms, and came in the wake of the heartbreaking Kavanaugh case, but if Taylor’s image – one that allures fans of all genders, sexualities, ages and races – had been at the liberal forefront of America’s pop culture-shaped politics three years ago, there’s a fine chance we might not have found ourselves in this situation in the first place.
Fifty-three percent of white women voted for Trump. That’s Swift’s strongest demographic, and though I’m being purely hypothetical here, her voice being thrown into the ring could have helped put the first woman in the White House. We can attest to that influence already: since she came out in support of Tennessee Democratic candidates Phil Bredesen and Jim Cooper, urging her fans to head to the polls, there was a huge spike in voter registrations – 65,000 on Sunday alone.
But for so long she decided to stay silent: through the Trump campaign, and his term so far, and the oppressive bills that directly affected – or were significantly supported – by many of the marginalised people in her crowds every night. Her position as a woman making catchy pop makes her a queer icon, and she’s vocally supported the community in the past. Why couldn’t she denounce the Republican party’s abhorrent stance on LGBTQ+ people just once, and instil hope in a generation who see her as an idol? Of course, it’s a wonderful thing for America’s rocky future to have its most influential and accessible young star become the face of its more progressive and liberal party going forward, but we must always be wary of a how and when a celebrity chooses to make these things public knowledge.
Politics, after all, is a make-or-break subject for many artists, but for the ones at the top of their game with a gigantic fanbase to fall back on – like Taylor Swift – imbuing it with their public persona should be a necessity that doesn’t need to be mulled over too much. Sure, it can go horribly wrong in some situations (Kanye’s mass clout paired with a MAGA hat could have had a similar effect to Taylor’s), but I can’t help but think that Taylor’s power – if she’d put it to good use – might have helped liberate her most vulnerable fans and loyal followers a long time ago.